Wednesday, January 18, 2012
The Geology of Seismic Site Class and the Effect of Site Class on Structural Design A Joint CAGE/SEAC Event
Presenter: David Butler, Zonge International, Inc.
At least seven methods are used to measure Vs30. The gold standard of these measurements is crosshole seismic testing followed by in order of decreasing quality (and cost) downhole seismic, P-S suspension logging, cone penetrometer, s-wave refraction, multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) and refraction microtremor testing (Remi). Suspension logging, seismic cone, and s-wave refraction are seldom used due to difficult equipment, depth limitations, and interpretational barriers. Crosshole seismic has an ASTM standard (6429) but is costly. The other two methods depend on the correlation of surface wave velocities and s-wave velocities in layered rocks. The dispersion of surface waves makes them effective in noisy, i.e. most urban, situations.
Building codes and regulations attempt to sort natural materials into categories, specifically site classifications by Vs30 values. Mother Nature frowns on this engineering technique and has placed most building sites in the Denver at the boundary of site class C (Vs30>1200 ft/s) and D (Vs30<1200ft/s). A statistical compilation of more than 30 sites near Denver will be presented. Depth to bedrock variations and precision of the measurements are the two main contributors to a potential error of up to 8-12%. The sounding model used for calculation in the surface techniques is one-dimensional; the measurement is two (or three) dimensional using a line up to 300 feet long. Engineering judgment is required when the Vs30 comes out as 1199 ft/s or when severe bedrock topography is measured or suspected. The exposure of the site to potential seismic events is an additional factor usually underestimated in the Denver area.
For a list of CAGE members, please click here.
CAGE is a proud partner with QBS Colorado. For more information, go to http://www.qbscolorado.org.
|